ground zero logic

According to the official US government theory about 9/11 - an airplane flew into the building 95 floors above, and the jet fuel got so hot that it transferred it's energy downward and caused the metal on the support columns to fail synchronously, as well as leaving behind all the tell-tale signs of a controlled demolition charge using thermate, which leaves a sulfidised residue, and is also the only known method of slicing construction grade steel of this strength and volume in this alloted time.

Now, given the fact that jet fuel can only reach a temperature far below that which would be necessary to melt and evaporate steel, as definitely occurred on 9/11 as shown by the following photograph taken at ground zero:

We must therefor conclude that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. Especially when you consider that one of the three buildings which fell down at free-fall speed was not even hit by a plane, yet still had the molten metal.

Add to this the compelling evidence given to us from hundreds of first responders and eyewitnesses who heard and saw explosions - as well as the numerous video and audio recordings taken by news teams and others, as shown in this short video - go ahead and take a few minutes and watch it, I'm not going anywhere.

Proof of Bombs at WTC on 9/11

This webcast is compilation of video material from September 11, 2001, from a number of different sources. The media makes the reports of internal explosions disappear In the minutes after the initial attacks on the World Trade Centers, reporters on the scene clearly reported MULTIPLE explosions in both buildings. These live reports were somehow left on the "cutting floor" when the final version of 9/11 was packaged for the public.

If you don't accept the obvious conclusion that there were many explosives used to bring down the towers, then you must somehow explain:

- how the jet fuel could slice through steel like in the picture above, 95 floors down from where the plane crashed, and with a residue ONLY at the straight line cut, and only possible by thermate reaction.

- where all the explosive energy came from to disintegrate the structural steel and allow the collapse at free-fall speed. There is simply no other mechanism that fits the evidence. Look at the dripping metal beams, glowing red hot - now explain it with jet fuel - a physical impossibility - unless you want to disregard the laws of thermodynamics.

Add to these facts the media's completely criminal and reprehensible complicity over these subsequent years, and what we have here folks is a full-blown fascist dictatorship - where your government can call you a terrorist for even questioning their fairy tales about 9/11, and then lock you up and torture you without any chance of a fair trial - hell, they even put all that into law.

How can this be happening? - it's happening because of the corruption which has overtaken your government. It's happening because the 5 corporations who control ALL of the mainstream media are owned by the same people who make the machinery and the bombs of war, it is in their financial interest to keep us in a state of perpetual conflict and confusion at the expense of our freedom, our rights as individuals, and any sense of dignity as human beings.

Now, if you still don't understand that it had to be controlled demolition then go back to the first picture and go through it all a bit slower this time, and each time, until you get it.

The facts about 9/11 and the immutable physical laws of nature will not be altered - only your capacity for critical thought.